There are no “significant” traffic
impacts caused by the glut of new high-density housing planned
and already
approved in downtown Walnut
Creek.
And the City Council has the numbers to prove
it. Of course, the way
the Council has
decided to quantify
traffic impacts
has a lot to do with this conclusion.
Saturday, May 18, 2013
Monday, May 13, 2013
Rewriting the General Plan
Walnut Creek’s latest General Plan was
adopted in April of 2006 after a two-year long process of public input and
review. The Plan was intended to provide
a vision of what the City would be like in 2025. We’re not even halfway there and much of the
plan has been abandoned. The same goes
for various Specific Plans that were intended to cover smaller areas of the
downtown in much greater detail.
The City Council has been happy
to clear the way for developers of projects that call for raising the General
Plan height limits and totally rewriting land use designations. Other projects sail through the City
Commissions with no apparent regard for previously established planning or
design principles.
Thursday, May 9, 2013
Five former mayors ...
A major kerfuffle has arisen at City Hall over which City employees knew
about, and should have reported to the police, (or were obligated by law to
report) alleged incidents of sexual misconduct at the Lesher Center. Four employees were placed on administrative
leave pending an investigation by the City Manager. The employees were apparently about to be
cleared, when a question was raised as to whether the City Manager himself knew
about, and didn’t report, the incident.
The suspension of the employees, the besmirching of the City
Manager’s reputation and the leaking of the whole sorry story to the press (but
apparently not the alleged sexual misconduct) was so upsetting to former City mayors
Rainey, Skrel, Hicks, Regalia and Abrams that they published a letter chastising
the City Council for their handling of the situation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)